Teamfight Tactics
Ekko · Teamfight Tactics: Unit costs and base values
Ekko · Base resource cost: 4 · Traits: Firelight · Scrap · Ambusher · Role: APReaper
What the data says
Ekko
- Base resource cost
- 4
- Traits
- Firelight · Scrap · Ambusher
- Role
- APReaper
- Base health
- 1100
- Base attack damage
- 50
- Base armor
- 60
- Base magic resistance
- 60
- Base attacks per second
- 0.85
- Mana to cast
- 50
- Starting mana
- 0
- Base range
- 1
- Ability
- Splitting Seconds
Using this reference
Check the version of Ekko before comparing its numbers. Age, civilization, tier or star level can identify different records under the same unit name. Costs and population belong to the selected record, so compare like with like before planning a group.
If materials are listed, use the quantity calculator for the number of units you want to produce. That total is a resource budget, not a combat forecast. The table does not model positioning, opposing units, upgrades or a complete army composition.
One useful comparison
For Base resource cost, Ekko is listed at 4, compared with 3 for Scar: a difference of 1. This compares that field in the recorded variants only. Read the other fields before deciding whether the trade-off matters to your use.
Plan your scenario
| Detail | Ekko | Singed | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base resource cost | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Traits | Firelight · Scrap · Ambusher | Chem-Baron · Sentinel | — |
| Role | APReaper | APTank | — |
| Base health | 1100 | 650 | 450 |
| Base attack damage | 50 | 55 | -5 |
| Base armor | 60 | 40 | 20 |
| Base magic resistance | 60 | 40 | 20 |
| Base attacks per second | 0.85 | 0.6 | 0.25 |
| Mana to cast | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Starting mana | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Base range | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ability | Splitting Seconds | Dangerous Mutations | — |
A name without a verified local label stays in the source language. The surrounding guide and controls are localized; identifiers are not invented translations.
Related entries
Sources and snapshot
Teamfight Tactics · Sources and snapshot ↗
Snapshot reviewed: